The Alexander Milburn Co.

20 Cited authorities

Virginian Ry. v. Federation
300 U.S. 515 (1937) Cited 835 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer could be enjoined for failing to “treat” with an elected representative as required by Section 2, Ninth of the RLA
J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 332 (1944) Cited 457 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"
Regal Knitwear Co. v. Board
324 U.S. 9 (1945) Cited 428 times
Holding "successors and assigns" are liable for contempt if they are properly within the scope of the injunction under Rule 65(d)
Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.
309 U.S. 350 (1940) Cited 315 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
Wilson v. United States
221 U.S. 361 (1911) Cited 756 times
Holding that corporations are not afforded the privilege against self-incrimination
Pennoyer v. Neff
95 U.S. 714 (1877) Cited 2,662 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that absent service of the summons and complaint, the defendant was deprived of “due process of law”
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
United States v. Morgan
307 U.S. 183 (1939) Cited 234 times
Finding that a district court has inherent power to stay disbursement of funds until revised payments are finally adjudicated
Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B
315 U.S. 100 (1942) Cited 187 times
Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order
Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board
316 U.S. 31 (1942) Cited 160 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”

The Alexander Milburn Co.

20 Cited authorities

Holding that an employer could be enjoined for failing to “treat” with an elected representative as required by Section 2, Ninth of the RLA

Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"

Holding "successors and assigns" are liable for contempt if they are properly within the scope of the injunction under Rule 65(d)

Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

Holding that corporations are not afforded the privilege against self-incrimination

Holding that absent service of the summons and complaint, the defendant was deprived of “due process of law”

Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

Finding that a district court has inherent power to stay disbursement of funds until revised payments are finally adjudicated

Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”