§

Texas Electric Cooperatives, Inc.

160 N.L.R.B. 440 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Texas Electric Cooperatives, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Roth v. United States

    354 U.S. 476 (1957)   Cited 2,345 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California obscenity statute was not preempted by federal law prohibiting the mailing of obscene material because the state law did not burden or interfere with the federal postal functions

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  4. Irving Air Chute Company v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times
    In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ace Comb Co.

    342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ace Comb Co., 342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965) and N.L.R.B. v. Bird Machine Co., 161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947), where instructions to supervisory employees not to make coercive statements did not relieve employer of imputed liability it is indicated that it might be otherwise if these instructions had been communicated to the employees.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Ambox, Incorporated

    357 F.2d 138 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ambox, Inc., 357 F.2d 138 (5 Cir. 1966), both the attorney for the employer and the president of the Company were guilty of coercive measures in their attempts to obtain copies of statements made to Board investigators.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

    346 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co., 346 F.2d 936, 939 (5th Cir. 1965), the court stated, "When the General Counsel charges that an employer has committed an unfair labor practice, he must produce substantial evidence from which it may be inferred that a violation of the Act took place.

  9. International Un. of El., R. M. v. N.L.R.B

    352 F.2d 361 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 12 times
    Concurring opinion of Judge Burger

  10. Skyline Homes, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    323 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 13 times

    No. 19352. October 11, 1963. Rehearing Denied November 13, 1963. Larry S. Davidow, Davidow Davidow, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Standau E. Weinbrecht, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. The petition of Skyline Homes, Inc.