ยง
Texaco, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  4. E. A. McQuade Tours v. Consol. Air Tour Manual

    409 U.S. 1109 (1973)   Cited 96 times
    Finding no per se illegal group boycott in airlines' refusal to list tour operator where tour operator was not competitor of airlines and there was no intent to exclude him from market

  5. Allied Industrial Workers, AFL-CIO Local Union No. 289 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    476 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 48 times
    Noting that "naked information" regarding the filing of a decertification petition without information regarding the number of signatories is insufficient to create good faith doubt of union majority status, even with additional evidence present

  6. E. L. Wiegand Division v. N.L.R.B

    650 F.2d 463 (3d Cir. 1981)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that employer may not terminate worker's disability benefits when he publicly supports a strike because disabled employee cannot withhold employment services

  7. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 176 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 32 times
    Giving false testimony at hearing on unfair labor practice charge; unfair labor practice

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Jemco, Inc.

    465 F.2d 1148 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 14 times
    In NLRB v. Jemco, Inc., 465 F.2d 1148 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1109, 93 S.Ct. 911, 34 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973), the employer refused to pay accrued vacation benefits and argued, as the employer does in the present case, that no finding of discrimination, and thus no violation of ยง 8(a)(3), was possible where all the striking employees had been treated alike.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Frick Company

    397 F.2d 956 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 12 times
    In NLRB v. Frick Co., 397 F.2d 956 (3d Cir. 1968), the company's vacation plan provided that "[n]o vacation or vacation pay will be allowed or paid to any person who is not on the payroll of the Company on Wednesday preceding the week in which vacation pay is distributed."

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Darling Company

    420 F.2d 63 (7th Cir. 1970)   Cited 3 times

    No. 17394. January 6, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Madge F. Jefferson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Ternell Vaughan, Fred Leicht, Jr., Armstrong, Teasdale, Kramer Vaughan, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent. Before KNOCH, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAIRCHILD and KERNER, Circuit Judges. KNOCH, Senior Circuit Judge