§
Tex-Tan, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  2. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bradley Washfountain

    192 F.2d 144 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 55 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Bradley Washfountain Co., 7 Cir., 192 F.2d 144, 152, 153, we explicitly stated: "The cases involving the propriety of an employer's solicitation of individual employees, seem to fall into at least three classes.

  4. NLRB v. Item Co.

    220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 36 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Item Company, 220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955), this court held that an employer had no confidentiality privilege to withhold from the union relevant wage data, "which the union's own employee-members apparently refused to disclose to it."

  5. J.I. Case Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

    253 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 20 times
    In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.

  6. Taylor Forge Pipe Works v. N.L.R.B

    234 F.2d 227 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 16 times

    No. 11617. June 6, 1956. Robert W. MacDonald, Henry E. Seyfarth, Lee C. Shaw, Owen Fairweather, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mozart G. Ratner, Jacobs, Kamin Ratner, Chicago, Ill., for Forge and Machine Workers

  7. National Labor Bd. v. Braswell Motor Freight

    213 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 3 times

    No. 14663. June 4, 1954. Rehearing Denied August 6, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, James R. Webster, Fort Worth, Tex., Samuel M. Singer, Peter Bauer, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Cecil A. Morgan, Sam R. Sayers, Morgan Shropshire, Rawlings, Sayers, Scurlock Eidson, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. PER