4 Cited authorities
In re Etablissements Darty Et Fils
759 F.2d 15 (Fed. Cir. 1985) Cited 8 timesIn Darty et Fils, however, even though, the primary question was whether "Darty" was primarily merely a surname, the Board had correctly held that the Opposers’ "provides no support for their contention."
Application of I. Lewis Cigar Mfg. Co.
205 F.2d 204 (C.C.P.A. 1953) Cited 2 timesPatent Appeals No. 5943. June 24, 1953. Hauff Warland and James M. Mason, New York City, for appellant. E.L. Reynolds, Washington, D.C. (H.S. Miller, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents. Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, JOHNSON, WORLEY, and COLE, Judges. WORLEY, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the rejection by the examiner of the application for registration filed December 5, 1947, under the provisions of section
Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Watson
204 F.2d 32 (D.C. Cir. 1953) Cited 1 timesNo. 11454. Argued January 27, 1953. Decided March 12, 1953. Mr. C. Willard Hayes, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Frank H. Marks, Chicago, Ill., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Joseph Schimmel, Atty., U.S. Patent Office, with whom Mr. E.L. Reynolds, Sol., U.S. Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee. Before PROCTOR, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges. FAHY, Circuit Judge. Sears, Roebuck and Co., the appellant, in 1908 adopted as a trade-mark for sporting goods "J C Higgins", not written
Section 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty
15 U.S.C. § 1 Cited 3,260 times 78 Legal AnalysesForbidding every "contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States"