§

Tennessee Packers, Inc.

146 N.L.R.B. 165 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Tennessee Packers, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wagner Iron Works

    220 F.2d 126 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 48 times

    Nos. 11121, 11141. March 7, 1955. Rehearing Denied April 5, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Maurice Alexandre, Atty., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Albert J. Goldberg, Milwaukee, Wis., for Bridge, Structural Ornamental Iron Workers Shopmen's Local 471 (AFL). Morris Karon, Milwaukee, Wis., for Wagner Iron Works. Max Raskin, Milwaukee, Wis., for International Union, United Automobile

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shedd-Brown MFG

    213 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 14 times

    No. 11031. May 17, 1954. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 17, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Clarence A. Meter, Arnold Ordman, Duane Beeson, and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Donald O. Wright, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brady Aviation Corp.

    224 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15382. June 30, 1955. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Ruth V. Reel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Irving L. Goldberg, Ben Pickering, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. In a decision affirming the findings of the examiner, that respondent had violated Sec. 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Labor Management Act, 29

  7. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Chicago Steel Found

    142 F.2d 306 (7th Cir. 1944)   Cited 3 times

    No. 8493. May 10, 1944. Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Chicago Steel Foundry Company requiring respondent to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, to offer reinstatement and back pay to a certain employee, and to make whole the employees discriminatorily laid off. Petition granted. Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel., Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wilson Line

    122 F.2d 809 (3d Cir. 1941)   Cited 5 times
    In NLRB v. Wilson Line, 122 F.2d 809 (C.C.A.3d 1941) our Court of Appeals again held that a company cannot be required to reinstate employees for whom there is no work as a result of curtailment of operations. More recently in NLRB v. Southeastern Pipe Line Co., 210 F.2d 643 (5th Cir. 1954) it was held that where the employee did not have the knowledge required for a new position created by combining two former jobs and had been given a transfer to another location at the same pay, reinstatement should not be ordered.