§

Tenneco Chemicals, Inc.

176 N.L.R.B. 611 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Tenneco Chemicals, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Truck Dvrs. Un. L. No. 413, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    Nos. 17662, 17663. Argued October 30, 1963. Decided April 9, 1964. Certiorari Denied November 16, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 264. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,662. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,663. Mr. Gary Green, Atty

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W. Coast Casket Co.

    205 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13515. June 30, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 29, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Coun., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Coun., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Coun., Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna A. Blake, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James S. Duberg and Holmes E. Hobart, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, petitions for enforcement of an order

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.

    258 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ill. Bell. Tel. Co.

    189 F.2d 124 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 14 times

    No. 10305. Heard April 23, 1951. Decided May 21, 1951. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Robert E. Ackerberg, National Labor Relations Board, Chicago, Ill., George J. Bott, Associate General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, and Maurice Alexandre, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kenneth F. Burgess, Howard P. Robinson, Gordon W. Winks, and Arthur R. Seder, Jr., all of Chicago

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montag Bros

    140 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1944)   Cited 3 times
    In NLRB v. Montag Bros., Inc. 5 Cir. 1944, 140 F.2d 730 this court affirmed without discussion a Board finding that it was an unfair labor practice to discharge non-union employees who had refused to cross a picket line at their employer's place of business.

  6. Pan-American Petroleum Transport v. U.S.

    21 F.2d 791 (S.D.N.Y. 1927)   Cited 1 times

    July 7, 1927. Burlingham, Veeder, Masten Fearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and C.B. Manley O'Kelley, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelant. Emory R. Buckner, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Horace M. Gray, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States. In Admiralty. Libel by the Pan-American Petroleum Transport Company, as owner of the steamship Norman Bridge, against the United States, as owner of the steamship Rapidan. On exceptions to report of special

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,104 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"