§

Teledyne Still-Man

295 N.L.R.B. 161 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Teledyne Still-Man

10 Cited authorities

  1. Letter Carriers v. Austin

    418 U.S. 264 (1974)   Cited 609 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

    552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 40 times
    In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

  5. Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson, v. N.L.R.B

    649 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Florida Hotel

    751 F.2d 1571 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 17 times

    No. 83-5452. February 8, 1985. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Barbara A. Atkin, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph H. Kaplan, Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, Sugarman, Rosenthal De Castro, Miami, Fla., for Hotel, Motel, Restaurant Hi-Rise Employees Bartenders Union, Local 355, AFL-CIO. Joel I. Keiler, McLean, Va., for Southern Beau. Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg Casey, Carl A. Schwarz, Jr., New York City, for Estate of Kaskel, et al. Application for Enforcement

  7. N.L.R.B. v. A.P.W. Products Co.

    316 F.2d 899 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 40 times

    No. 258, Docket 27676. Argued March 11, 1963. Decided April 25, 1963. Melvin Pollack, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sidney A. Coven, Joseph Lepie, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Benjamin Wyle, New York City and Warren Woods, Washington, D.C., submitted brief as attorneys for amicus curiae, United Paper-makers and Paperworkers, AFL-CIO. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cambria Clay Prod

    215 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times

    No. 12072. July 7, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, Thomas R. Haley, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio (J. Mack Swigert, Charles D. Lindberg, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief; Miller, Searl Fitch, Portsmouth, Ohio, of counsel), for respondent. Before McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and GOURLEY, District Judge. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Markle Mfg. Co. of San Antonio

    623 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 4 times
    In Markle, the Fifth Circuit tolled the award of backpay after the company was ordered to reinstate an employee, who had been discharged in violation of the Act.

  10. Rubin Bros. Footwear v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    203 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times
    In Rubin Bros. Footwear v. National Labor Relations Bd., 203 F.2d 486 (C.C.A. 5th), the Court said: "If anything is settled in labor law and under the act, we think it is that membership in a union does not guarantee the member against a discharge as such. It affords protection against discharge only where it is established that the discharge is because of union activity."