Teledyne Still-Man

9 Cited authorities

ITT CONTINENTAL BAK. v. WILLIAM INGLIS SONS BAK
459 U.S. 825 (1982) Cited 254 times
Finding it unnecessary to reach that issue
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 233 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.
397 U.S. 920 (1970) Cited 200 times 5 Legal Analyses
Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.
396 U.S. 258 (1969) Cited 184 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 81 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
Giddings Lewis, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
710 F.2d 1280 (7th Cir. 1983) Cited 3 times
Denying enforcement of Board order where legitimate business justification supported employer's requirement that formerly striking employees provide periodic notice of their intent to remain on preferential hiring list
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand
130 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1942) Cited 51 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 130 F.2d 919, 925, we held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e)(2), 28 U.S.C.A. — which provides that a Master's findings stand unless clearly erroneous — would be applicable, by analogy, to findings of a Master appointed by a court of appeals.
J.H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B
399 F.2d 356 (5th Cir. 1968) Cited 14 times
Nos. 23744, 23909. July 23, 1968. Rehearings En Banc Denied October 1, 1968. Henry J. Read, Peter H. Beer, Richard B. Montgomery, New Orleans, La., for J.H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co. Inc. Ralph N. Jackson, New Orleans, La., Jacob Sheinkman, James J. Graham, New York City, for Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William S. Bishop, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Ralph N. Jackson, New Orleans, La., for intervenor
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Efco Manufacturing, Inc.
227 F.2d 675 (1st Cir. 1955) Cited 9 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Efco Manufacturing Co., 227 F.2d 675, 676 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1007, 76 S.Ct. 651, 100 L.Ed. 869 (1955), a striker's threat to beat up a plant manager was considered not egregious because the manager was not put in direct fear of a beating.

Teledyne Still-Man

9 Cited authorities

Finding it unnecessary to reach that issue

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

Denying enforcement of Board order where legitimate business justification supported employer's requirement that formerly striking employees provide periodic notice of their intent to remain on preferential hiring list

In N.L.R.B. v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 130 F.2d 919, 925, we held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e)(2), 28 U.S.C.A. — which provides that a Master's findings stand unless clearly erroneous — would be applicable, by analogy, to findings of a Master appointed by a court of appeals.

In N.L.R.B. v. Efco Manufacturing Co., 227 F.2d 675, 676 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1007, 76 S.Ct. 651, 100 L.Ed. 869 (1955), a striker's threat to beat up a plant manager was considered not egregious because the manager was not put in direct fear of a beating.