§

Tele-Trip Co., Inc.

146 N.L.R.B. 276 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Tele-Trip Co., Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Indiana Metal Products v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    202 F.2d 613 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 48 times

    No. 10717. March 10, 1953. Edward J. Fahy and Shultz Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel and Ruth V. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Indiana Metal Products Corporation

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Exchange Parts Company

    304 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19106. June 22, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Karl Mueller, Harold E. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. This case presents the question whether it is an unfair labor practice for an employer to

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Imperial-Eastman Corporation

    322 F.2d 679 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 1 times

    No. 14097. September 23, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John Harrington, Albert J. Smith, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY, CASTLE and KILEY, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations

  6. Western Cartridge Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    134 F.2d 240 (7th Cir. 1943)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 8142, 8155. March 1, 1943. Petitions to review and set aside, and on request for enforcement of, an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Separate petitions by Western Cartridge Company and by Western Cartridge Employees' Independent Union, etc., to review and set aside, and request by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of, an order of such board requiring the Western Cartridge Company to cease and desist from giving effect to individual employment contracts, from