6 Cited authorities
In re Chemical Dynamics, Inc.
839 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Cited 14 timesConcluding that generalized sales and advertising figures do not establish secondary meaning where the alleged mark is not promoted by itself but instead as part of a larger mark or with other designs or marks
In re Canadian Pacific Ltd.
754 F.2d 992 (Fed. Cir. 1985) Cited 14 timesHolding that offering services for sale to shareholders of a corporation do not constitute sales to another and thus do not fall within the Lanham Act
Application of Servel Inc.
181 F.2d 192 (C.C.P.A. 1950) Cited 5 timesPatent Appeals No. 5658. April 3, 1950. J.L. Kelly, Washington, D.C. (A. Yates Dowell, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. E.L. Reynolds, Washington, D.C. (Walter J. Derenberg, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents. Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and JACKSON, O'CONNELL, and JOHNSON, Judges. O'CONNELL, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in which the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Marks refusing appellant's application to register
Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification
15 U.S.C. § 1051 Cited 3,923 times 127 Legal AnalysesRequiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark
Section 2.56 - Specimens
37 C.F.R. § 2.56 Cited 19 times 1 Legal Analyses(a) An application under section 1(a) of the Act, an amendment to allege use under § 2.76 , a statement of use under § 2.88 , an affidavit or declaration of continued use or excusable nonuse under § 2.160 , or an affidavit or declaration of use or excusable nonuse under § 7.36 must include one specimen per class showing the mark as actually used in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services identified. When requested by the Office as reasonably necessary to proper examination, additional
Section 2.51 - Drawing required
37 C.F.R. § 2.51 Cited 13 timesAllowing a typed drawing for marks consisting of words that are not depicted in special form