§

Ted Mansour's Market

199 N.L.R.B. 218 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Ted Mansour's Market

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Interstate 65 Corporation

    453 F.2d 269 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 22 times

    No. 71-1198. December 30, 1971. Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jack H. Weiner, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Morris B. Borowitz, Louisville, Ky., Borowitz, Slyn Russell, Louisville, Ky., for respondent. Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges. JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board found respondent

  2. Burns I. Detective Ag. v. N.L.R.B

    441 F.2d 911 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 18 times
    In Burns, the duty to bargain did not mature until late June, at the point when it became clear that the successor had hired the requisite complement of his predecessor's employees.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. George E. Light Boat Storage, Inc.

    373 F.2d 762 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times

    No. 22962. February 28, 1967. As Modified March 23, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard S. Rodin, Atty., NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert R. Breaker, LaPorte, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, BELL, and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks a decree enforcing its order of July 2, 1965, against the George E. Light

  4. N.L.R.B. v. M M Oldsmobile, Inc.

    377 F.2d 712 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that in context of National Labor Relations Act breach of contract is "not" ipso facto, an unfair labor practice

  5. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.