§

Techno Construction Corp.

333 N.L.R.B. 75 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Techno Construction Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  5. Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Beck Engineering & Surveying Co.

    746 F.2d 557 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 115 times
    Holding that liquidated damages are mandatory

  6. Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    104 F.3d 1354 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 21 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Allegheny Ludlum, however, we upheld an unfair labor practice violation where the employer warned it would "no longer find ways" to avoid laying off employees if they joined a union.

  7. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42 v. N.L.R.B

    450 F.2d 1322 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 24016, 24261. Argued March 2, 1971. Decided September 24, 1971. Mr. Paul Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Raymond W. Bergan, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners in No. 24,016 and intervenors in No. 24,261. Mr. George A. Pappy, Los Angeles, Cal., also entered an appearance for petitioners in No. 24,016 and intervenors in No. 24,261. Mr. Carl W. Robertson, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Teamsters, Etc.

    342 F.2d 18 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 18 times

    No. 225, Docket 29096. Argued December 8, 1964. Decided March 3, 1965. Stephen B. Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., of counsel), for petitioner. Harry Pozefsky, Gloversville, N.Y., for respondent. Before WATERMAN, MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges. MOORE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (the Board or NLRB) petitions for enforcement of its

  9. Hercules Powder Company v. N.L.R.B

    297 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 6 times

    No. 18401. November 17, 1961. M.L. Taliaferro, C.V. Stelzenmuller, Birmingham, Ala., William V. Roth, Jr., Wilmington, Del., Moore, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman Burr, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for petitioner. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Allan I. Mendelsohn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CAMERON

  10. American Brake Shoe v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    244 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1957)   Cited 9 times
    In American Brake Shoe Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 244 F.2d 489, we recognized that the right to engage in a lawful strike is a protected concerted activity.