Teamsters Local Union No. 676
4 Cited authorities
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 timesHolding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Eichleay Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd.
206 F.2d 799 (3d Cir. 1953) Cited 18 timesNo. 11003. Argued June 4, 1953. Decided August 26, 1953. Sherman T. Rock, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Theodore M. Burns, Jr., and Paul, Lawrence Rock, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin Spaeth, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges. KALODNER
Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 160 Cited 7,059 times 23 Legal AnalysesFinding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB