§

Teamsters Local No. 377 a/w International Brotherhood of Teamsters

08-CA-039174 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 22, 2011)
Teamsters Local No. 377 a/w International Brotherhood of Teamsters

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.

    102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."

  2. In re Grand Jury Sub. John Doe

    584 F.3d 175 (4th Cir. 2007)   Cited 25 times
    Recognizing that unless a party is claiming that subpoenaed documents are privileged, he lacks standing to object to a subpoena directed to a third party

  3. National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro

    81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"