§

Teamsters Local No. 83

231 N.L.R.B. 1097 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Teamsters Local No. 83

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 247 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers

    400 U.S. 297 (1971)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work

  5. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  6. Seafarers International Un., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    265 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 46 times

    No. 14373. Argued November 4, 1958. Decided January 29, 1959. Mr. C. Paul Barker, New Orleans, La., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Ray R. Murdock, Washington, D.C., and Seymour W. Miller, Brooklyn, N.Y., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, with whom Mr. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Mr. Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers & Common Laborers of America

    389 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21569. January 25, 1968. Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Hod Carriers, Building & Common Laborers' Union of America, Local No. 1140

    285 F.2d 397 (8th Cir. 1960)   Cited 18 times

    No. 16538. December 22, 1960. Allan I. Mendelsohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Richard J. Scupi, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for respondents. David D. Weinberg, Omaha, Neb., on the brief. Before WOODROUGH, VAN OOSTERHOUT, and MATTHES, Circuit Judges. MATTHES

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 369, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    528 F.2d 317 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 1 times

    No. 75-1454. January 14, 1976. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Stanley R. Zirkin, Peter M. Bernstein, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Isenberg, Raymond L. Sales, Thomas G. Jarrell, Segal, Isenberg, Sales Stewart, Louisville, Ky., for respondent. Louis E. Woolery, Smith Smith, Louisville, Ky., for intervenor. Before EDWARDS, LIVELY and ENGEL, Circuit Judges. ORDER This case is before the court on application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters District Council

    383 F.2d 89 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 6 times
    Upholding NLRB's finding of an unlawful threat when picketing was threatened and initiated in order to force construction companies, against whom union had no dispute, to cease doing business with primary employer