Teamsters Local 75, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehous

7 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
  3. Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.

    525 U.S. 813 (1998)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 97-1846. October 5, 1998. ORDERS C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 130 F. 3d 1101.

  4. Pirlott v. N.L.R.B

    522 F.3d 423 (D.C. Cir. 2008)   Cited 14 times
    Reasoning that, in order to charge objecting nonmembers union dues, union can show "a positive correlation between wages and union density in the relevant market at issue"; expert witness presented such evidence
  5. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 24 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"
  6. Penrod v. N.L.R.B

    203 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 13 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Hudson requires a union to explain how its affiliate used money that was ultimately charged to the nonmembers
  7. Finerty v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    113 F.3d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 10 times

    No. 96-1348 Argued April 22, 1997 Decided June 3, 1997 Glenn M. Taubman, Roslyn, NY, argued the cause and filed the briefs, for petitioners. Jill A. Griffin, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent, with whom Howard E. Perlstein, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, were on the brief. Frederick Havard, Supervisory Attorney, Washington, DC, entered an appearance. James