§

Teamsters Local 727 (No Employer)

13-CB-060708 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 5, 2012)
Teamsters Local 727 (No Employer)

9 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Local 334

    481 F.3d 875 (6th Cir. 2007)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 05-1579/1639/1714. Argued: July 28, 2006. Decided and Filed: April 6, 2007. ARGUED: David Seid, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. J. Douglas Korney, Farmington Hills, Michigan, Jeffrey E. Beeson, Beeson Terhorst, Santa Rosa, California, for Respondents. ON BRIEF: David Seid, Meredith L. Jason, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. J. Douglas Korney, Farmington Hills, Michigan, Jeffrey E. Beeson, Beeson Terhorst, Santa Rosa, California

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Cutting, Inc.

    701 F.2d 659 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting an ALJ's credibility findings where the ALJ's adverse inferences were "contrary to direct, positive testimony"

  4. Brooks v. United States

    309 F.2d 580 (10th Cir. 1962)   Cited 35 times

    No. 7094. October 3, 1962. Ted J. Davis, of Fuller, Smith, Mosburg Davis, Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellant. Robert L. Berry, Asst. U.S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okla. (B. Andrew Potter, U.S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okla., with him on the brief), for appellee. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. The defendant, Brooks, was convicted on an information which charged him with knowingly persuading, seducing and enticing his wife, a girl under 17 years

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec Wkrs., Local 11

    772 F.2d 571 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 9 times

    No. 84-7439. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1985. Decided September 24, 1985. William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick Havard, Atty., Washington, D.C., for petitioner N.L.R.B. Robert Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners-intervenors Loveall, Sokol and Mott. Elizabeth R. Lishner, Davis, Frommer Jesinger, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN

  6. Matter of Circus Time, Inc.

    5 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D. Me. 1979)   Cited 7 times

    Bankruptcy No. 279-00687. Adv. No. 279-0002. December 24, 1979. Gregory A. Tselikis, and Charles Miller, Portland, Me., for creditors' committee. Richard E. Poulos, and Robert C. Robinson, Portland, Me., for debtor. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION FREDERICK A. JOHNSON, Bankruptcy Judge. This proceeding was commenced by the complaint of the Debtor-in-Possession, Circus Time, Inc. for authority to sell all of its tangible and intangible assets free and clear of any interest in such property pursuant to 11 U

  7. N.L.R.B. v. N.M. Dist. Coun. of Carpenters

    454 F.2d 1116 (10th Cir. 1972)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 128-70, 129-70. February 4, 1972. Vivian Asplund, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Gerald R. Bloomfield, Albuquerque, N. M. (Kool, Kool Bloomfield, Albuquerque, N. M., on the brief), for respondents. Before HILL, SETH and HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judges. HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. In these proceedings the National Labor Relations Board

  8. Plumbers Local U. No. 17, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    575 F.2d 585 (6th Cir. 1978)   Cited 2 times

    No. 76-2059. May 4, 1978. Patrick Johnson, Jr., Robert A. Tillman, Jim B. Johnson, Johnson, Johnson Johnson, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Jay Shanklin, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Raymond A. Jacobson, Director, Region 26, N.L.R.B., Memphis, Tenn., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CELEBREZZE, LIVELY and KEITH, Circuit Judges. ORDER The petitioner has filed an application to review and set aside an order

  9. Rule 611 - Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses and Presenting Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 611   Cited 1,937 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting trial judge broad discretion to control witness examination