§

Teamsters Local 722 (Kasper Trucking)

314 N.L.R.B. 1016 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Teamsters Local 722 (Kasper Trucking)

19 Cited authorities

  1. Liteky v. United States

    510 U.S. 540 (1994)   Cited 7,945 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a judge's impatience and annoyance did not justify disqualification

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America

    390 U.S. 254 (1968)   Cited 326 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

  3. Local 777, Democratic U. Org. Com v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"

  4. Mautz & Oren, Inc. v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers Union, Local No. 279

    882 F.2d 1117 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 39 times
    Presenting as an affirmative defense an employer's failure to arbitrate preserves arbitral options, without the need to make a formal demand

  5. Machlett Laboratories, Inc. v. Techny Industries, Inc.

    665 F.2d 795 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 32 times
    Stating that the well known standard for granting a preliminary injunction requires the plaintiff to show that: she has at least a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits; she has no adequate remedy at law and will otherwise be irreparably harmed, the threatened injury outweighs the threatened harm the preliminary injunction may cause the defendants, and the granting of the preliminary injunction will not disserve the public interest

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Overseas Motors, Inc.

    818 F.2d 517 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 14 times

    No. 86-5225. Argued February 2, 1987. Decided May 11, 1987. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Nancy Hunt (argued), Peter Winkler, Bernard Gottfried, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Patrick McNamara, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. J. Laevin Weiner (argued), C. Robert Wartell, William E. Sigler, Maddin, Weiner, Hauser, Wartell and Roth, Southfield, Mich., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY, JONES and NORRIS, Circuit

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Webb Ford, Inc.

    689 F.2d 733 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting shifting of burden of persuasion

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Superior Sales, Inc.

    366 F.2d 229 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Superior Sales, Inc., 366 F.2d 229 (8th Cir. 1966), this court laid down a number of guidelines to be considered in determining in a case like this whether the discharge of the employee in question was discriminatory and amounted to an unfair labor practice.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Del Rey Tortilleria, Inc.

    823 F.2d 1135 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 5 times

    No. 86-1251. Argued December 9, 1986. Decided July 8, 1987. John H. Ferguson, NLRB, Washington, D.C., William A. Widmer, III, Carmell, Charone, Widmer Mathews, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Irving M. Geslewitz, Adams, Fox, Adelstein Rosen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUDAHY and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and WILL, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Hubert L. Will, Senior District Judge of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Honaker Mills, Div. of Top Form M

    789 F.2d 262 (4th Cir. 1986)   Cited 6 times
    Noting that some of the judge's remarks about which the plaintiff complained were "at least innocuous, and at most injudicious," but "[did] not rise to the level necessary to support the serious charge of judicial bias"