Teamsters Local 595 (Sweetener Products)

H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
Dycus v. N.L.R.B
615 F.2d 820 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 19 times
No. 78-2285. February 22, 1980. David B. Finkel, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for petitioner; Neil M. Herring, Finkel Herring, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief. Andrew Tranovich, argued for respondent. George A. Pappy, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for Local 42; Pappy, Kaplon Vogel, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief. Paul Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for Local 598; Reich, Adell Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief. Petition to Review an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY and