Teamsters Local 315 (Atchison Railway)

16 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers

    400 U.S. 297 (1971)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work
  4. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"
  5. Steelworkers v. Labor Board

    376 U.S. 492 (1964)   Cited 75 times
    Stating that section 8(b) prohibits labor unions from engaging in "secondary boycotting" by "exert[ing] pressure on an employer not involved in the relevant labor dispute ('the secondary employer') in order to obtain a favorable result in the ongoing labor dispute with another employer ('the primary employer')"
  6. Intern. Ass'n of Bridge, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times
    Enforcing Board's order finding unlawful inducement in part based on conversations at neutral employer's office gate between union agent and neutral employees who failed to report for work later that day, even though there was no testimony regarding the content of the conversations
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Ass'n of Broadcast Employees & Technicians, AFL-CIO, Local 31

    631 F.2d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 11 times
    Conducting such an inquiry
  8. Linbeck Const. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    550 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 14 times
    Affirming 219 N.L.R.B. 997
  9. J. F. Hoff Electric Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    642 F.2d 1266 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that a neutral gate was tainted when supplies which were to be used by the struck employer, but were owned by the owner of the construction project, were delivered through the gate
  10. Ramey Const. Co., Inc. v. Local U. No. 544

    472 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 16 times

    No. 72-1275. January 31, 1973. John Cosmic, John W. Broadfoot, Amarillo, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants. Tom Upchurch, Jr., Amarillo, Tex., Buddy Wright, Fort Worth, Tex., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Before RIVES, THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the legality of common situs picketing conducted by the defendant-union on numerous construction sites in the Amarillo,