§

Teamsters Local 70

288 N.L.R.B. 1224 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Teamsters Local 70

11 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters

    429 U.S. 507 (1977)   Cited 138 times
    Stating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers

    400 U.S. 297 (1971)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work

  5. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  6. Griffith Co. v. N.L.R.B

    545 F.2d 1194 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 21 times
    In Griffith we reviewed the NLRB's dismissal of a contractor's complaint that the Master Labor Agreement involved an unfair labor practice by requiring contractors to cease doing business with delinquent subcontractors.

  7. Soft Drink Wkrs. Union Local 812 v. N.L.R.B

    657 F.2d 1252 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 16 times
    In Soft Drink Workers Local 812 v. NLRB, 657 F.2d 1252 (D.C.Cir. 1980), a union violated section 8(b)(4)(B) by picketing a distributor of nonlocal products to enhance the job opportunities of union members at local plants, id. at 1260; its picketing was thus "tactically calculated to satisfy union objectives elsewhere."

  8. George Koch Sons, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 323 (4th Cir. 1973)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 73-1019, 73-1480. Argued October 3, 1973. Decided December 14, 1973. Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C. and Joseph A. Yocum, Evansville, Ind. (Johns Zimmerman, Washington, D.C. and Kahn, Dees, Donovan Kahn, Evansville, Ind., on brief), for petitioner in No. 73-1019. Gerard C. Smetana, Chicago, Ill. (Milton A. Smith, Gen. Counsel, Otto F. Wenzler and Richard B. Berman, Labor Relations Counsel, Washington, D.C., S. Richard Pincus, Lederer, Fox Grove, Chicago, Ill., on brief), for amicus curiae

  9. Chamber of Commerce of U.S., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    574 F.2d 457 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 7 times

    Nos. 75-2064, 75-2166 and 75-2770. March 8, 1978. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in Nos. 75-2064 and 75-2770 May 4, 1978. Donald C. Robinson, Butte, Mont., for appellants-petitioners. Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., for N.L. R.B. Paul T. Bailey of Bailey, Doblie Brunn, Portland, Gerard C. Smetana, of Borovsky, Smetana, Ehrlich Kronenberg, Washington, D.C., for intervenors. Kenneth C. McGuiness, of Washington, D.C., for amici curiae. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before

  10. National Maritime Un., Am. v. N.L.R.B

    342 F.2d 538 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 19 times

    Nos. 234, 235, Dockets 29067, 29068. Argued January 15, 1965. Decided March 5, 1965. Abraham E. Freedman, New York City (Charles Sovel, New York City, and Mandell Wright, Houston, Tex., on the brief), for petitioner. Stephen B. Goldberg, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Lawrence M. Joseph, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. ANDERSON