Teamsters Local 87

30 Cited authorities

Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,216 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
388 U.S. 175 (1967) Cited 335 times
Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America
390 U.S. 254 (1968) Cited 327 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"
Painter v. Nekolny
455 U.S. 1021 (1982) Cited 216 times
Rejecting award for emotional injury damages because mere conclusory statement that plaintiff was "very depressed" failed to establish causal connection between plaintiff's injuries and defendant's discriminatory conduct
United States v. Silk
331 U.S. 704 (1947) Cited 542 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that truck drivers who owned their own trucks and hired their own helpers were "small businessmen" who were properly classified as independent contractors
Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board
357 U.S. 93 (1958) Cited 201 times
Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act
Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
394 U.S. 423 (1969) Cited 117 times 6 Legal Analyses
Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board
316 U.S. 31 (1942) Cited 160 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.
412 U.S. 67 (1973) Cited 49 times
Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line
Local 777, Democratic U. Org. Com v. N.L.R.B
603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978) Cited 102 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"

Teamsters Local 87

30 Cited authorities

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

Rejecting award for emotional injury damages because mere conclusory statement that plaintiff was "very depressed" failed to establish causal connection between plaintiff's injuries and defendant's discriminatory conduct

Holding that truck drivers who owned their own trucks and hired their own helpers were "small businessmen" who were properly classified as independent contractors

Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”

Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line

Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"