§

Teamsters, Local 542

191 N.L.R.B. 515 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Teamsters, Local 542

7 Cited authorities

  1. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers

    428 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 44 times

    Docket 29149. May 18, 1970. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul Elkind and Seth D. Rosen, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Cohen and Weiss, New York City (Bruce H. Simon, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before WATERMAN, SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: In 1965 this court, as the result of an illegal secondary boycott by Local 282 of

  3. United Brick Clay Workers v. Deena Artware

    198 F.2d 637 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 49 times
    In Deena Artware, "Whoever shall be injured" was applicable to the primary employer upon which the union attempted to force their acceptance as representatives of the primary employer's employees.

  4. Chauffeurs, Teamsters, No. 175 v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.2d 261 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15957. Argued May 29, 1961. Decided July 6, 1961. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Harry S. Littman, Washington, D.C., filed a brief on behalf of McJunkin Corp

  5. United Steelworkers of Am., v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.2d 256 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 5 times

    No. 15771. Argued March 2, 1961. Decided May 4, 1961. Petition for Reconsideration Denied August 10, 1961. Mr. David E. Feller, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Mr. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Messrs. Louis Sherman, Laurence

  6. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"