§

Teamsters Local 186 (Associated General Contractors)

313 N.L.R.B. 1232 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Teamsters Local 186 (Associated General Contractors)

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 433

    600 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that "[t]he Board may properly find an unfair labor practice when the issue has been fully litigated even though not specifically pleaded in the complaint"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Buffalo

    811 F.2d 82 (2d Cir. 1987)   Cited 8 times
    In NLRB v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Buffalo, Inc., 811 F.2d 82, 87 (2d Cir. 1987), we held that the NLRB may find an "uncharged" violation "if all issues surrounding the violation have been litigated fully and fairly."

  3. Local 594, Int'l U., United Auto. v. N.L.R.B

    776 F.2d 1310 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 84-5962, 84-6086. Argued October 1, 1985. Decided November 12, 1985. Carlton R. Roeser, argued, Robert L. O'Connell and Associates, Pontiac, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Daniel Pollitt, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and, CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: This case is before the court on the petition of Local 594, International

  4. Pattern Makers' Ass'n, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    622 F.2d 267 (6th Cir. 1980)

    No. 78-1011. Argued April 14, 1980. Decided June 5, 1980. George M. Mauer, Jr., Kenneth W. Kalls, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, John D. Burgoyne, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Michael Messitte, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WEICK, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS and PECK, Senior Circuit Judges. HARRY PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on the petition of the Pattern Makers' Association

  5. Section 401 - Congressional declaration of findings, purposes, and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 401   Cited 1,042 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the LMRDA was essential to "afford necessary protection of the rights and interests of employees and the public generally as they relate to the activities of labor organizations . . ."