§

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers

119 N.L.R.B. 852 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers

14 Cited authorities

  1. Garner v. Teamsters Union

    346 U.S. 485 (1953)   Cited 690 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo

    353 U.S. 138 (1957)   Cited 143 times
    Holding the LMRA inapplicable to the picketing of a foreign ship operated entirely by foreign seamen

  4. Labor Board v. Rockaway News Co.

    345 U.S. 71 (1953)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that employees may bargain away their statutory right to strike

  5. Teamsters Union v. N. Y., N. H. H.R. Co.

    350 U.S. 155 (1956)   Cited 53 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 33. Argued November 10, 1955. Decided January 9, 1956. An interstate railroad which engaged in hauling loaded truck-trailers "piggy-back" brought an action in a state court to enjoin a labor union from conduct which interfered with such operation and which allegedly violated the Labor Management Relations Act. Employees of motor carriers with which the union had collective bargaining agreements had been persuaded by agents of the union to refrain

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

  7. Rabouin v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    195 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 75 times
    In Rabouin v. N.L.R.B., 195 F.2d 906 (2nd Cir., 1962), Justice Clark, then a Circuit Judge, specifically held that a union's demand for damages equal in amount to the wages paid a non-union driver was not an attempted exaction in violation of § 8(b)(6).

  8. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Gen. Drivers, Etc

    225 F.2d 205 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 43 times

    No. 15305. August 2, 1955. Miss Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Springs, Md., Owsley Vose, Asso. Ch. Enf. Br., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Cnsl., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Samuel M. Singer, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., Mullinax Wells, Dallas, Tex., Dixie, Ryan Schulman, Houston, Tex., for respondents. Before RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS and DE VANE, District Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge

  9. Sales Drivers, Etc. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    229 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 24 times
    Noting that "the fact of concerted activity at a common situs where one not common was available" does not itself establish a secondary boycott violation

  10. Meier Pohlmann Furniture Company v. Gibbons

    233 F.2d 296 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 12 times

    No. 15402. April 26, 1956. Rehearing Denied May 23, 1956. Thomas Rowe Schwarz, St. Louis, Mo. (Fordyce, Mayne, Hartman, Renard Stribling, St. Louis, Mo., was with him on the brief), for appellant. Gregory M. Rebman and Harold I. Elbert, St. Louis, Mo., for appellees. LaTourette Rebman and Gregory M. Rebman, St. Louis, Mo., were on the brief for appellees Anderson Motor Service, Inc., Hussman Roper Freight Lines, Inc., Lovelace Truck Service, L.A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., and Consolidated Forwarding