§

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Etc., Local 901

134 N.L.R.B. 895 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Etc., Local 901

19 Cited authorities

  1. Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.

    332 U.S. 194 (1947)   Cited 4,197 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if the agency rests its decision on "grounds are inadequate or improper, the court is powerless to affirm the administrative action by substituting what it considers to be a more adequate or proper basis"

  2. Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.

    318 U.S. 80 (1943)   Cited 3,778 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an administrative order cannot be upheld unless the grounds upon which the agency acted in exercising its powers were those upon which its action can be sustained"

  3. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  4. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  5. Hughes v. Superior Court

    339 U.S. 460 (1950)   Cited 285 times
    In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.

  6. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl

    315 U.S. 769 (1942)   Cited 236 times
    Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

  8. Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.

    75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. United States Steel Corporation

    278 F.2d 896 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 25 times

    No. 13011. Argued March 8, 1960. Decided April 13, 1960. Supplemental Opinion May 17, 1960. Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Standau E. Weinbrecht, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. W.D. Armour, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John C. Bane, Jr., John G. Wayman, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Robert Molinar, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for United States Steel Corp. J

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp.

    283 F.2d 26 (1st Cir. 1960)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 5698, 5691, 5590, 5728, 5729, 5736 and 5740. October 18, 1960. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Sarah Torres Peralta, San Juan, P.R., for Las Vegas Sand and Gravel Corp. Raymond E. Jordan, William A. Curran, and Sherwood Clifford, Providence, R.I., for Local 476, etc. George L. Weasler, Santurce, P.R., for International

  11. Section 169-F:1 - Purpose And Application Of Chapter

    N.H. Rev. Stat. § 169-F:1   Cited 39 times

    This chapter shall apply to any court ordered placement or placement for an episode of treatment as defined in RSA 193:27, VII, of any minor pursuant to RSA 169-B or any child pursuant to RSA 169-C or RSA 169-D, for the purposes of the effective implementation of any such placement. RSA 169-F:1 Amended by 2023, 79:140, eff. 7/1/2023. 1987, 402:35, eff. July 25, 1987.