Target Corporation

9 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,036 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 556 (1978) Cited 196 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013) Cited 96 times 37 Legal Analyses
Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"
Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 17 times 2 Legal Analyses
Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B
482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 13 times 2 Legal Analyses
Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA
Evans v. Stephens
387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004) Cited 15 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment
United States v. Woodley
751 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 14 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that recess appointments clause applies to all vacancies that exist when the Senate is in recess and noting that the courts and the executive branch have consistently adhered to this view
United States v. Allocco
305 F.2d 704 (2d Cir. 1962) Cited 25 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding the President may make appointments to all vacancies that exist during a Senate recess

Target Corporation

9 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"

Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA

Holding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment

Holding that recess appointments clause applies to all vacancies that exist when the Senate is in recess and noting that the courts and the executive branch have consistently adhered to this view

Finding the President may make appointments to all vacancies that exist during a Senate recess