§

Tambe Electric, Inc.

346 N.L.R.B. 380 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Tambe Electric, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 49 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  4. Hartman Bros. Heating Air v. N.L.R.B

    280 F.3d 1110 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Hartman Bros. Heating Air Conditioning, Inc., the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals found that a "salt" may lie to get a job "if the lie concerns merely his status as a salt, union organizer, or union supporter and not his qualifications for the job."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Special Mine Services, Inc.

    11 F.3d 88 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 6 times
    Discussing the "depressing pattern" of Board decisions in which "[t]here is one serious issue, which the Board tucks into a footnote"