§

Tamara Foods, Inc.

258 N.L.R.B. 1307 (N.L.R.B. 1981)
Tamara Foods, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Industrial Union Department v. American Petroleum Institute

    448 U.S. 607 (1980)   Cited 280 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Finding an unconstitutional delegation because "[i]t is difficult to imagine a more obvious example of Congress simply avoiding a choice which was both fundamental for purposes of the statute and yet politically so divisive that the necessary decision or compromise was difficult, if not impossible"

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Abilities and Goodwill, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    612 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing factors to be considered when determining whether concerted action is protected

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ben Pekin Corp.

    452 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 30 times

    No. 18894. October 4, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet Skaare Morris, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Harold A. Katz, Irving M. Friedman, Charles Barnhill, Jr., Zenia S. Goodman, Chicago, Ill., Katz Friedman, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, and KERNER and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This application by the

  5. Shelly & Anderson Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    497 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 20 times
    In Shelly Anderson Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 497 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1974), we identified the four elements essential to protected status of concerted activity.

  6. Sullair P.T.O., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    641 F.2d 500 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 12 times
    Shouting vulgarities towards management warrants discharge

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Modern Carpet Industries, Inc.

    611 F.2d 811 (10th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times

    No. 78-1749. Argued November 27, 1979. Decided December 28, 1979. Edward S. Dorsey, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Andrew F. Tranovich, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Sam Sexton, Jr., Fort Smith, Ark., for respondent. Before DOYLE and McKAY, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge. Of the District of

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Plastilite Corporation

    375 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18443. March 30, 1967. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Burton L. Raimi, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief with her. John E. Tate, of Nelson, Harding, Acklie, Leonard Tate, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, GIBSON and HEANEY, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. This case is

  9. Section 141 - Short title; Congressional declaration of purpose and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 141   Cited 2,069 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Stating Congress' declaration of purpose that "employers, employees, and labor organizations each recognize under law one another's legitimate rights in their relations with each other"