§
Talsol Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 435 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. CER Inc.

    762 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1985)   Cited 3 times

    No. 84-4582. Summary Calendar. June 10, 1985. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Christopher Young, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Fulbright Jaworski, T.J. Wray, R. Michael Moore, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for other interested parties. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WILLIAMS, JOLLY, and HILL, Circuit Judges. ROBERT MADDEN HILL, Circuit Judge

  5. Maryland Drydock Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    183 F.2d 538 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 19 times
    In Maryland Drydock Co. v. NLRB, 183 F.2d 538, 539 (4th Cir. 1950), we held that an employer was entitled to maintain discipline by prohibiting "defamatory and insulting statements which reasonably tend to destroy such discipline....