§

Talladega Cotton Factory, Inc.

106 N.L.R.B. 295 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
Talladega Cotton Factory, Inc.

20 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant

    344 U.S. 375 (1953)   Cited 24 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375, 73 S.Ct. 375, 97 L.Ed. 407, the legal effect of affidavits filed by union officers was successfully challenged in an enforcement proceeding in the Court of Appeals.

  3. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Wireless

    193 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 42 times

    No. 12736. December 27, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, NL RB, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory A. Harrison, Richard Ernst, Malcolm T. Dungan and Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges and LEMMON, District Judge. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on petition of the National

  4. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  5. Cusano v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    190 F.2d 898 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 10404. Argued May 22, 1951. Filed August 16, 1951. Samuel J. Davidson, Hoboken, N.J. (DeFazio, Davidson DeFazio, Hoboken, N.J., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Washington, D.C., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This case is

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Robbins Tire

    161 F.2d 798 (5th Cir. 1947)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire Rubber Co., 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 798, 800, where the proportion of the witnesses against, to those for, the examiner's conclusions was far greater than it is here, we held exactly to the contrary of this contention.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ray Smith Transport

    193 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 28 times

    No. 13612. December 20, 1951. Elmer Davis, Ch. Law Officer, NLRB, Fort Worth, Tex., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, W.D. White, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and STRUM, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Exonerating the trial examiner of specific charges of unfairness and bias, and adopting substantially whole his findings, conclusions and recommendations

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Pennwoven, Inc.

    194 F.2d 521 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 26 times
    Rejecting the Board's contention that an employer's discriminatory failure to reinstate an employee constituted a continuing violation, since under that reasoning the employee's case would never be closed until it was finally litigated

  9. Ohio Assoc. Tel. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 664 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times

    No. 11327. Decided November 29, 1951. Sidney Griffith, Columbus, Ohio (Power Griffith, Donald C. Power, and Sidney D. Griffith, all of Columbus, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Arnold Ordman, Morris A. Solomon, Washington, D.C., on the brief for respondent. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, SIMONS and MILLER, Circuit Judges. SIMONS, Circuit Judge. Upon the complaint of the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Ohio Associated Telephone

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co.

    190 F.2d 12 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 19 times

    No. 13402. June 25, 1951. Maurice Alexandre, Atty., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Lee Sellers, Otis E. Nelson, Wichita Falls, Tex., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order of the Board are reported at 82 N.L.R.B. 497. The Company contends that the American Federation of Labor (referred

  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,211 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”