§

Taleda Ford, as Personal Represent-ative of the Estate of Willie L Ford v. Larry Reynolds

92070410 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 20, 2019)
Taleda Ford, as Personal Represent-ative of the Estate of Willie L Ford v. Larry Reynolds

24 Cited authorities

  1. Allen v. McCurry

    449 U.S. 90 (1980)   Cited 5,776 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under res judicata, parties may not "relitigat[e] issues that were or could have been raised" in a prior action

  2. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education

    465 U.S. 75 (1984)   Cited 3,561 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that petitioner's state-court judgment in litigation [had] the same claim preclusive effect in federal court that the judgment would have in the . . . state courts"

  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore

    439 U.S. 322 (1979)   Cited 4,251 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district courts have discretion to refuse to apply offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against a defendant if such an application of the doctrine would be unfair

  4. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Marchon Eyewear, Inc.

    672 F.3d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 146 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an independent claim including the limitation "magnetic member" includes ferromagnetic material in addition to a magnet, in light of dependent claim limiting "magnetic member" to a magnet

  5. Morris v. Jones

    329 U.S. 545 (1947)   Cited 266 times
    Holding that a default judgment constitutes a decision on the merits for res judicata purposes

  6. Sweats Fashions v. Pannill Knitting Co.

    833 F.2d 1560 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 163 times
    Finding that, on review of a grant of summary judgment in a USPTO opposition proceeding, "[opposer] would have us infer bad faith because of [registrant's] awareness of [opposer's] marks. However, an inference of 'bad faith' requires something more than mere knowledge of a prior similar mark. That is all the record here shows."

  7. Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos

    103 F.3d 762 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that post-judgment contempt orders are final and appealable orders

  8. Riehle v. Margolies

    279 U.S. 218 (1929)   Cited 260 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment

  9. Sinito v. U.S. Department of Justice

    176 F.3d 512 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 85 times
    Holding that FOIA cause of action, despite the absence of a statutory survival provision, survives plaintiff's death

  10. Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration Systems

    223 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 78 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the same cause of action can exist in two cases only where the same set of transactional facts are involved in those cases and that, where the transactional facts differ, the doctrine of claim preclusion does not apply

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 330,364 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 25   Cited 10,825 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities

  13. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,806 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark