§

T. Steele Construction, Inc.

348 N.L.R.B. 1173 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
T. Steele Construction, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Director, Off. of Work. Comp. v. Greenwich Collieries

    512 U.S. 267 (1994)   Cited 445 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the Administrative Procedure Act, the burden of proof encompasses the burden of persuasion; when the evidence is evenly balanced, the party with the burden must lose

  3. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

    511 U.S. 571 (1994)   Cited 97 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Board's test is inconsistent with both the statutory language and th[e] Court's precedents"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Detroit Newspaper Agency v. N.L.R.B

    435 F.3d 302 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing Board finding of Wright Line prima facie case for lack of substantial evidence

  7. New Orleans Cold Storage & Warehouse Co., Ltd. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    201 F.3d 592 (5th Cir. 2000)   Cited 11 times
    Rejecting a company's argument that the employee would have been terminated regardless of his union activity where the evidence was that the company did not ordinarily enforce certain rules and procedures

  8. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Aquatech, Inc.

    926 F.2d 538 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that employer had discriminatory motive in discharging the employee when there was a hiatus between asserted employee problem and discipline

  10. Mathews Readymix, Inc. v. N. L. R. B

    165 F.3d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that uncontested coercive interrogation of replacement employees did not taint the employees' signatures on the decertification petition

  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,588 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party