§

T-Mobile USA, Inc.

363 NLRB No. 171 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
T-Mobile USA, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 280 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 221 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  3. Flex Frac Logistics, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    746 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 2014)   Cited 31 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8

  4. United States v. Kanu

    695 F.3d 74 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 12 times

    No. 10–3114. 2012-10-5 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Abdul Kassim KANU, also known as Ace, Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:09–cr–00356–2). Charles J. Soschin, appointed by the court, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Joseph R. Conte. Mark Aziz, Assistant U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Ronald C. Machen Jr., U.S. Attorney, and Roy W. McLeese III, John P. Mannarino, Frederick

  5. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

  6. Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA

  7. Flagstaff Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    715 F.3d 928 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 2 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1326 11–1398. 2013-04-26 FLAGSTAFF MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Steven D. Wheeless argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Alan M. Bayless Feldman. Elizabeth A. Heaney, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  8. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation v. N.L.R.B

    297 F.3d 468 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding substantial evidence in the record to support the NLRB's finding that an employer violated § 8 by suspending an employee because she engaged in protected union activities

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co.

    344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co., 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 617, we recognized that an employer has no vested right to insist that union representation be established by a Board conducted election but we further held that an employer acting in good faith belief that a union lacked majority representation was not required to recognize and bargain with the union until such doubt was resolved.