§

T. M. Duche Nut Co., Inc.

174 N.L.R.B. 457 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
T. M. Duche Nut Co., Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. River Togs, Inc.

    382 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 48 times
    In NLRB v. River Togs, Inc. (2d Cir. July 27, 1967) 382 F.2d 198, however, we recognized some of the limitations of the authorization card procedure, calling for scrutiny of the manner of execution of the cards.

  2. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    289 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 43 times

    No. 15384. Argued April 11, 1960. Decided June 30, 1960. Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Miss Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent. Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and

  3. Engineers Fabricators, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that an issue was not fairly litigated where the allegation was not listed in the complaint and counsel did not understand the relevance of testimony later used to support the uncharged violation

  4. N.L.R.B. v. S.E. Nichols Company

    380 F.2d 438 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 25 times

    No. 395, Docket 30961. Argued May 1, 1967. Decided June 21, 1967. Paul J. Spielberg, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Attorney), for petitioner. James L. Burke, Elmira, N.Y., for respondents. Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge: S.E. Nichols Company through its subsidiary Nichols Discount City operates a

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Luisi Truck Lines

    384 F.2d 842 (9th Cir. 1967)   Cited 24 times

    No. 21554. October 27, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Thomas P. Graham, Jr., Director, N.L.R.B., Seattle, Wash., for appellant. Velikanje, Moore Countryman, Richard R. Greiner, Morris G. Shore, Yakima, Wash., Vance, Davies, Roberts Bettis, Seattle, Wash., for appellee. Before HAMLIN, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions this court pursuant to section 10(e) of

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Swan Super Cleaners, Inc.

    384 F.2d 609 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 21 times

    No. 16952. October 25, 1967. Vivian Asplund, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C. (Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., John J. Chester, Columbus, Ohio, on the brief; Reilly Wells, Washington, D.C., Chester Rose, Charles D. Minor, Vorys, Sater, Seymour Pease, Columbus

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. TRW-Semiconductors, Inc.

    385 F.2d 753 (9th Cir. 1967)   Cited 20 times

    No. 21549. November 24, 1967. Gregory L. Hellrung, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued) for petitioner. Stanley Tobin (argued), Hill, Farrer Burrill, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and HAUK, District Judge. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge. Petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The trial examiner found, and the Board adopted his findings, that respondent employer interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees with respect

  8. Crawford Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    386 F.2d 367 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 18 times

    No. 11040. Argued May 31, 1967. Decided October 27, 1967. Clifton L. Elliott and Harry L. Browne, Kansas City, Mo. (Spencer, Fane, Britt Browne, Kansas City, Mo., Marion A. Prowell, Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., M. Wallace Moncure, Jr., and Moncure Cabell, Richmond, Va., on brief) for petitioner. Burton L. Raimi, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Lawrence M. Joseph, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief)

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Dan Howard Mfg. Co.

    390 F.2d 304 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Dan Howard, supra, 390 F.2d at page 309, we further stated: "The court [Sixth Circuit] pointed out that it is relevant to consider the subjective intention of the signer and his expressed state of mind in deciding whether a misapprehension was knowingly induced."

  10. N.L.R.B. v. United Mineral Chemical Corp.

    391 F.2d 829 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In United Mineral & Chemical Corp., the Second Circuit stated that the fact-finder could validly conclude based on witness testimony that the theft had not occurred. 391 F.2d at 833.