§
T & L Leasing

12 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Tower Co.

    329 U.S. 324 (1946)   Cited 259 times
    Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc.

    486 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 42 times
    In NLRB v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc., 486 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir. 1973), we recognized two reasons for discounting third party misconduct.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Best Products Co., Inc.

    765 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 23 times
    In Best Products we stated that "while the court is not bound by the Board's view on retroactive application, it should defer to those views absent manifest injustice."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Duriron Co., Inc.

    978 F.2d 254 (6th Cir. 1992)   Cited 13 times

    No. 91-6415. Argued September 28, 1992. Decided October 27, 1992. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Linda Dreeben (briefed), Lisa Richardson Shearin (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Gerald P. Fleischut, Director, N.L.R.B., Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Robert J. Brown (argued and briefed), Teresa D. Jones, Thompson, Hine Flory, Dayton, Ohio, Gordon Jackson, Jackson, Shields, Yeiser Cantrell, Cordova, Tenn., for respondent. Before: NELSON and SILER, Circuit Judges;

  5. N.L.R.B. v. O'Daniel Trucking Co.

    23 F.3d 1144 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 9 times
    Objecting company failed to meet burden of presenting facts which show that the Board's decision was not supported by substantial evidence

  6. Daylight Grocery Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    678 F.2d 905 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 19 times
    Stating that to overturn elections on the basis of such incidents would "merely encourage anonymously created incidents"

  7. Summa Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    625 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 14 times
    In Summa, the Board Agent, without consulting the two observers for the employer, assented to a third union observer during the first of two voting sessions, although the Stipulation there provided for an equal number of observers for each side. This court agreed with the employer that there was a significant risk that "the imbalance, with the acquiesence of the Board agent, could create an impression of predominance on the part of the Union and partiality on the part of the Board."

  8. Beck Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    590 F.2d 290 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 12 times

    No. 77-3210. December 13, 1978. Robert V. Magor (argued), Severson, Werson, Berke Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Susan Papadopoulos, Atty. (argued), Washington, D.C., W. David Holsberry, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), Davis, Cowell Bowe, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before: MERRILL and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. The Honorable Jack E. Tanner, United States District Judge for the Western

  9. United States v. Scott

    625 F.2d 623 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 8 times
    In United States v. Scott, 625 F.2d 623 (5th Cir. 1980), Scott filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, seeking to vacate the sentence imposed upon him after his plea of guilty. He contended his plea was involuntary because the sentencing court incorrectly informed him of the maximum possible sentence.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Barker Steel Co., Inc.

    800 F.2d 284 (1st Cir. 1986)   Cited 1 times
    Noting that where a stipulation is ambiguous, "the Board has the authority to interpret the agreement according to what it finds to have been the intent of the parties"