Syracuse Color Press, Inc.

24 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines

    303 U.S. 261 (1938)   Cited 264 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.
  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
  4. Labor Board v. Clothing Co.

    301 U.S. 58 (1937)   Cited 61 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 422 and 423. Argued February 11, 1937. Decided April 12, 1937. The National Labor Relations Act, and orders made under it by the National Labor Relations Board, sustained upon the authority of National Labor Relations Board v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corp., ante, p. 1, as applied to a manufacturer of garments, having its factory in Virginia but which imported its cloth from other States and sold almost all of the finished products

  5. Republic Steel Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939)   Cited 59 times
    In Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939), modified on other grounds, 311 U.S. 7, 61 S.Ct. 77, 85 L.Ed. 6 (1940), this court stated that Congress must have contemplated that the protection of the National Labor Relations Act would extend to employees who commit minor acts of misconduct while exercising their right to strike.
  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Tenn. Coach Co.

    191 F.2d 546 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 11238. July 9, 1951. Sidney Sherman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, and Irving M. Herman, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn. (Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief; Anderson Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel), for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  7. Sax v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    171 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1948)   Cited 33 times
    In Sax v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 171 F.2d 769 (1948), and N.L.R.B. v. Armour Co., 5 Cir., 213 F.2d 625 (1954), the "perfunctory, innocuous remarks" stood "alone".
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Arthur Winer, Inc.

    194 F.2d 370 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Arthur Winer, Inc., 7 Cir., 194 F.2d 370, 373 (1952), there was a "serious question" of the sufficiency of evidence to sustain many findings of the examiner.
  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Mylan-Sparta Co.

    166 F.2d 485 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 29 times
    In Mylan-Sparta, the Board found the employer in violation of sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) when it discharged a number of employees for engaging in union activities.
  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    192 F.2d 160 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 23 times

    No. 59, Docket 22080. Argued October 10, 1951. Decided October 29, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Elizabeth Weston, and Marshall J. Seidman, all of Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. John A. Barr, David L. Dickson, Donald W. Alfrin, and Harold W. Bancroft, all of Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before CHASE, Circuit Judge, and GODDARD and DIMOCK, District Judges. CHASE, Circuit Judge.