§

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

09404920 (P.T.A.B. May. 2, 2013)
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

3 Cited authorities

  1. In re Morsa

    2012-1609 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2013)

    2012-1609 04-05-2013 IN RE STEVE MORSA STEVE MORSA, of Thousand Oaks, California, pro se. RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia. With him on the brief were JOSEPH G. PICCOLO and COKE M. STEWART, Associate Solicitors. O'MALLEY Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Serial No. 09/832,440. STEVE MORSA, of Thousand Oaks, California, pro se. RAYMOND T. CHEN

  2. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 379 times   634 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  3. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 22 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A