§
Swift & Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  2. Howell Chev. Co. v. Labor Board

    346 U.S. 482 (1953)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that a car retailer is subject to Commerce Clause as an "'integral part' of General Motors' national system of distribution."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co.

    204 F.2d 79 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 53 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 86 (9th Cir. 1953), we recognized that "carriage, behavior, bearing, manner and appearance of a witness, — his demeanor, —" may cause the trier of fact to reject uncontradicted testimony.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wheland Company

    271 F.2d 122 (6th Cir. 1959)   Cited 14 times

    No. 13792. October 29, 1959. Hans J. Lehmann, Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for petitioner N.L.R.B. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., Witt, Gaither, Abernathy, Caldwell Wilson, Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief, for respondent. Hugh Hafer, Milwaukee, Wis., David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., of counsel, David Leo Uelmen, Goldberg, Previant Cooper, Milwaukee, Wis., on the

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gluek Brewing Co.

    144 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 26 times
    In Glueck, the court recognized that an independent contractor could not be held liable for an unfair labor practice if it was "an entirely innocent and unconscious instrument" of the perpetrator of the practice, but "[w]here an independent contractor knowingly participates in the effectuation of an unfair practice, it places itself within the orbit of the Board's corrective jurisdiction."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Harris

    200 F.2d 656 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14027. January 5, 1953. Thomas J. McDermott, Attys., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James F. Hulse, El Paso, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for enforcement of an order of the Board issued on July 31, 1951, against respondent, Morris Harris et al., d/b/a Union Manufacturing Company

  7. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    194 F.2d 207 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 8 times
    In Stewart-Warner Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 194 F.2d 207 (C.C.A. 4, 1952), the court set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board which directed the employer to cease and desist from recognizing an A.F.L. union, referred to as I.B.E.W., as bargaining agent of its employees. It appeared that an election had been held under the Board's supervision in July of 1949 and at the election the A.F.L. union obtained a majority of the employees' votes.