§

Sweatermasters Co., Inc.

176 N.L.R.B. 301 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Sweatermasters Co., Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 176 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 32 times
    Giving false testimony at hearing on unfair labor practice charge; unfair labor practice

  4. Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    366 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times
    In Retail Clerks International Assn. v. NLRB, supra, MR. CHIEF JUSTICE (then Circuit Judge) BURGER explained the Board's policy on "managerial employees": "The Board also excludes from the protections of the Act, as managerial employees, 'those who formulate, determine, and effectuate an employer's policies,' AFL-CIO, [120 N.L.R.B. 969, 973 (1958)], and those who have discretion in the performance of their jobs, but not if the discretion must conform to an employer's established policy, Eastern Camera and Photo Corp., 140 N.L.R.B. 569, 571 (1963) (store managers who could set prices are not managerial).