SW General, Inc., d/b/a Southwest Ambulance

15 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 796 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits
  2. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Bakery Workers

    430 U.S. 243 (1977)   Cited 532 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration clause survived the expiration of the CBA, even though the agreement was silent as to survival
  3. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.

    484 U.S. 539 (1988)   Cited 329 times
    Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."
  4. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  5. Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 96 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"
  6. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 50 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction
  7. Department of the Navy, Marine Corps Logistics Base v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

    962 F.2d 48 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Outlining FLRA position
  8. Enloe Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    433 F.3d 834 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that contractual provision allowing employer to adopt or change policies during course of agreement permitted employer to unilaterally change on-call policy
  9. Evans v. Stephens

    387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 15 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment
  10. Honeywell Intern., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    253 F.3d 125 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 12 times
    Concluding that the following duration clause did not waive the union's rights: “The Effects Bargaining Agreement shall be effective as of May 30, 1994, and shall remain in effect until midnight on June 6, 1997, but not thereafter unless renewed or extended in writing by the parties”