§

Susie K.,1 Complainant, v. Ryan K. Zinke, Secretary, Department of the Interior (Bureau of Indian Affairs), Agency.

0120170994 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 26, 2018)
Susie K.,1 Complainant, v. Ryan K. Zinke, Secretary, Department of the Interior (Bureau of Indian Affairs), Agency.

10 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,406 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

  2. Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

    438 U.S. 567 (1978)   Cited 2,164 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context

  3. Arnett v. Kennedy

    416 U.S. 134 (1974)   Cited 1,590 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal statute authorizing discharge of federal employees for "such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service" was neither void for vagueness nor overbroad in light of "longstanding principles of employer-employee relationships" and "[the availability of legal counsel] to employees who [sought] advice on the interpretation of the Act and its regulations"

  4. Jones v. Bernanke

    557 F.3d 670 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 584 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "these principles apply equally to retaliation claims"

  5. Section 621 - Congressional statement of findings and purpose

    29 U.S.C. § 621   Cited 17,503 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs"

  6. Section 633a - Nondiscrimination on account of age in Federal Government employment

    29 U.S.C. § 633a   Cited 1,274 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Extending antidiscrimination provisions to federal employees, but providing such employees a different remedy for violations

  7. Section 1614.110 - Final action by agencies

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.110   Cited 226 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Compelling final decision “within 60 days of the end of the 30-day period for the complainant to request a hearing . . . where the complainant has not requested [one]”

  8. Section 1614.604 - Filing and computation of time

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.604   Cited 137 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the time limits applicable to the subject regulations "are subject to waiver, estoppel and equitable tolling"

  9. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 81 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"

  10. Section 1614.403 - How to appeal

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.403   Cited 34 times
    Indicating that failure to file timely appeal requires dismissal by EEOC