Supreme Bedding and Furniture Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,669 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera
179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950) Cited 24 times
No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease
National Labor Rel. Board v. Brown Paper Mill
133 F.2d 988 (5th Cir. 1943) Cited 3 times
No. 10252. February 23, 1943. Rehearing Denied April 2, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board against Brown Paper Mill Company, Inc., for enforcement of an order of the Board. Petition granted. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Maurice J. Nicoson, Principal Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. L