§

Supply Guys, Inc.

No. 77027097 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 6, 2008)
Supply Guys, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Power Test Petroleum Distributors v. Calcu Gas

    754 F.2d 91 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 95 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that irreparable injury "exists in a trademark case when the party seeking the injunction shows that it will lose control over [its] reputation"

  2. Application of Penn. Fashion Factory, Inc.

    588 F.2d 1343 (C.C.P.A. 1979)   Cited 2 times

    Appeal No. 78-577. December 7, 1978. Rehearing Denied January 18, 1979. Hymen Diamond, Pittsburgh, Pa., attorney of record, for appellant. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; Fred W. Sherling, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. LANE, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial

  3. Application of Baker Industries, Inc.

    565 F.2d 1211 (C.C.P.A. 1977)

    Appeal No. 77-575. December 8, 1977. Albert L. Ely, Jr., Ely Golrick, Cleveland, Ohio, attorney of record, for appellant. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents, Fred W. Sherling, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. BALDWIN, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), 193 USPQ 122 (1976), denying registration

  4. In re Lyndale Farm

    186 F.2d 723 (C.C.P.A. 1951)   Cited 25 times

    Patent Appeals No. 5736. January 16, 1951. Clarence A. O'Brien and Harvey B. Jacobson, Washington, D.C., (John H. Lewis, Jr., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. E.L. Reynolds, Washington, D.C., (W.J. Derenberg, New York City, of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents. Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and JACKSON, O'CONNELL, JOHNSON, and WORLEY, Judges. JOHNSON, judge. Lyndale Farm is a partnership in the business of breeding cattle at Floydada, Texas. It applied in September 1947 to the

  5. Application of Walker Process Equipment

    233 F.2d 329 (C.C.P.A. 1956)   Cited 13 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6194. May 15, 1956. Louis Robertson, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for Commissioner of Patents. Before JOHNSON, Acting Chief Judge, and WORLEY and JACKSON, retired Judges. WORLEY, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Trade-Mark Examiner refusing registration on the Principal Register of the words "Walker Process Equipment Inc." Registration was refused on the ground

  6. Application of Standard Oil Company

    275 F.2d 945 (C.C.P.A. 1960)   Cited 4 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6493. March 8, 1960. Leland L. Chapman, Cleveland, Ohio (Martin T. Fisher, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. United States Senior Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate in place of Judge O'Connell, pursuant to provisions of Section 294(d), Title 28 United States Code

  7. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,910 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  8. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 3,033 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark

  9. Section 2.56 - Specimens

    37 C.F.R. § 2.56   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) An application under section 1(a) of the Act, an amendment to allege use under § 2.76 , a statement of use under § 2.88 , an affidavit or declaration of continued use or excusable nonuse under § 2.160 , or an affidavit or declaration of use or excusable nonuse under § 7.36 must include one specimen per class showing the mark as actually used in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services identified. When requested by the Office as reasonably necessary to proper examination, additional