Supershuttle of Orange County, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Fixtures Mfg. Corp.

    669 F.2d 547 (8th Cir. 1982)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Fixtures Manufacturing Corp., 669 F.2d 547 (8th Cir. 1982), the Eighth Circuit rejected the First Circuit's approach and approved the Board's burden-shifting rule as within the latitude it should have in structuring its fact-finding process.
  5. TLC Lines, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    717 F.2d 461 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 2 times

    No. 82-2561. Submitted September 13, 1983. Decided September 27, 1983. Lewis, Rice, Tucker, Allen Chubb, John J. Gazzoli, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner TLC Lines, Inc. Petition for review of an order of National Labor Relations Board. Before HEANEY and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges, and HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) found that petitioner TLC Lines, Inc. (TLC), violated subsections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act