ยง

Supermarkets General Corp.

296 N.L.R.B. 1138 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Supermarkets General Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co.

    130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942)   Cited 69 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., 130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942), Judge Learned Hand stated his view of the type of activity protected by section 7.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Greyhound Lines

    426 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 27429. April 20, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Robert F. Houlihan, Lexington, Ky., for respondent. Before GOLDBERG, DYER and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board here seeks enforcement of an order issued against Southern Greyhound Lines, Inc. Our basic problem revolves around the discharge of a conscientious

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Browning-Ferris Ind., Chem. Serv

    700 F.2d 385 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 8 times

    No. 81-3069. Argued September 17, 1982. Decided February 17, 1983. Linda Dreeben, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A. Martin Wickliff, Jr., Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before POSNER and COFFEY, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge. Of the Northern District of Illinois. POSNER, Circuit Judge. The Board asks us to enforce its order finding that the respondent, BFI, committed an unfair labor practice by terminating two workers who refused to cross a picket

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Union Carbide Corporation

    440 F.2d 54 (4th Cir. 1971)   Cited 18 times
    In NLRB v. Union Carbide Corporation, 440 F.2d 54 (4th Cir. 1971), we held that ยง 7 protected an employee who refused as a matter of principle to cross a picket line maintained by fellow employees at his employer's place of business even though the striking union was not his bargaining representative.

  5. Teamsters, Chauffeurs Helpers v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 1011 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times

    No. 16415. Argued November 12, 1963. Decided December 5, 1963. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom