Superior Travel Service

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 107 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."
  5. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”
  6. New Orleans Cold Storage & Warehouse Co., Ltd. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    201 F.3d 592 (5th Cir. 2000)   Cited 11 times
    Rejecting a company's argument that the employee would have been terminated regardless of his union activity where the evidence was that the company did not ordinarily enforce certain rules and procedures
  7. Vico Products Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    333 F.3d 198 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 5 times
    Upholding restoration order where employer continued to occupy closed facility and had not shown that resuming operations would be unfeasible
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Bestway Trucking, Inc.

    22 F.3d 177 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that "the demonstrated falsity of some of the reasons offered by [the employer] for its actions. . . support the Board's conclusion that [the employer] acted with anti-union animus" when it made the employees' working conditions intolerable
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Steinerfilm, Inc.

    669 F.2d 845 (1st Cir. 1982)   Cited 11 times
    Ordering reinstatement of employee discharged for intemperate reaction to discipline for protected activities
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Potential Sch., Except. Children

    883 F.2d 560 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 1 times

    No. 87-1562. Submitted April 20, 1989. After a preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court in this case. The notice provided that any party might file a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." See Rule 34(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., Circuit Rule 34(f). No such statement having been filed, the appeal has been submitted on the briefs and the record. Decided August 23, 1989. Paul J. Spielberg, Elliot