Superior Fireproof Door & Sash Co., Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate ยง 8
  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
  3. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining
  4. Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

    337 U.S. 656 (1949)   Cited 88 times
    Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Andrew Jergens Co.

    175 F.2d 130 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 45 times

    No. 12051. May 17, 1949. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1949. Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board against the Andrew Jergens Company directing respondent to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively with the union. Order of the Board enforced. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Thomas J. McDermott, Attorney, National Labor

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Henry Heide, Inc.

    219 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 14 times

    No. 66, Docket 23078. Argued October 5, 1954. Decided January 19, 1955. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Schmidt, Egan, Kenny, Smith Murray, New York City (Godfrey P. Schmidt, of counsel), for respondent Henry Heide, Inc. Arnold Cohen, New York City (Herbert A. Simon, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent Local 452. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges