§

Superior Emerald Park Landfill, LLC

340 N.L.R.B. 449 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Superior Emerald Park Landfill, LLC

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 809 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

  5. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  7. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    228 F.3d 772 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 10 times
    Upholding designation of check-in area as “mixed-use” because that area “transformed into a congregation point for the drivers to drink coffee, read magazines and newspapers, and converse before their morning shift”

  8. The Edward S. Quirk Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    241 F.3d 41 (1st Cir. 2001)   Cited 7 times
    Vacating and remanding for further proceedings in absence of reasoned explanation from the Board

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Wis-Pak Foods, Inc.

    125 F.3d 518 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 7 times
    Upholding the NLRB's determination that the post-election grant of a wage increase was motivated by a desire to erode union support and was therefore an unfair labor practice

  10. Mid-Mountain Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    269 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 1 times

    No. 00-1422. Argued October 9, 2001. Decided November 6, 2001. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Ronald I. Tisch argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Susser and Mark M. Lawson. Anna L. Francis, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong